#146 – Hell? or Purgatory?

One of the most disturbing elements of the “Good News” preached by many Evangelicals has to do with an eternal conscious torment in a fiery hell.  This element is often the reason why so many people give up that form of faith, and the reason that so many people seek psychological and pastoral help for the trauma they are experiencing and from which they are trying to recover.  Nonetheless, it’s a point that so many Evangelicals double-down upon and get so very animated about.  Think about the reaction that Rob Bell evoked when he published his book Love Wins!   Netflix still carries a great movie — Come Sunday — which centers around the deeply polarizing response that an up-and-coming Evangelical preacher experiences … from family, from members of his church, and from his denominational leaders … when he begins to question everything about eternal conscious torment in a fiery hell.

In this episode, we talk to an Exvangelical pastor (Derek Kubilus) about his book (Holy Hell: a case against eternal damnation) in which he describes discovering a deep hell-shaped well of trauma in his congregants when they asked him to teach a class on heaven and hell, and also discovering a whole new understanding of hell when he actually studied what the Bible had to say (or not say) about hell:

  • some Christians seem to need there to be a hell …. they can’t tolerate the idea that there might not be a place of eternal conscious torment for people outside their tribe…. it’s a motivating ingredient in their “Good News” message
  • Derek grew up Methodist …. spent time as an Evangelical …. then came back to Methodism …. obtained his Master of Divinity degree and is now vicar at a local United Methodist church in Ohio
  • after doing research for the class on hell referred to above, he emerged as a committed universalist
  • for thousands of years, the ancient Hebrews had only a vague understanding of the afterlife: they talked about “Sheol,” which was neither heaven nor hell, but a dark dusty place much like the Babylonian picture of the afterlife.  It was absolutely NOT a place of eternal conscious torment and punishment.
  • despite that fact, most translations of the Old Testament translate “Sheol” as “hell” if the context seems to be negative, but as “grave” or “pit” if the context is neutral ….. or even pleasant! Yes you read that right: there are places in the Old Testament where Sheol is actually a pleasant place of peace and rest. We get into detail about that in the episode.
  • Hell is NOT just the absence of God, as many Christians like to say when they’re trying to soften the offensiveness of Hell, because there are Biblical passages that say God can even be found in Sheol
  • there is nothing in the Old Testament that suggests Sheol or hell is a place of eternal conscious torment
  • Lot and Abraham holding each other’s testicles (I kid you not!?) to make a vow is an anachronistic element of what Jews of their time understood about living on into the afterlife ….. you’ll have to listen to the episode to get the explanation!?
  • Greek thinking then replaced the world’s Babylonian understanding of the afterlife. Jewish scholars/writers started using “Hades” as a metaphor of Sheol.  Hades was also NOT a fiery pit of eternal torture. In fact, it had some very pleasant places: the Elysian fields and the Asphodel meadow. The worst part of Hades was Tartarus, where certain gods and demi-gods were punished by having to carry out endless meaningless tasks: like rolling a boulder to the very pinnacle of a mountain only for it to roll back down the other side (Sysiphus), or carry water in leaky buckets (Danaides), or have their liver eaten out by an eagle, only for it to grow back overnight and then be eaten again, every day (Prometheus).  But the average Greek person did not think anything like these punishments awaited them: again, their HADES was NOT a place of eternal conscious torment in a lake of fire.
  • at this time, Jewish scholars/writers started also using Gehenna  — the name of a garbage dump in a small valley outside Jerusalem (and now a Recreation Park!) — as a metaphor of the afterlife.  Again, this was NOT a place of eternal conscious torment!!!!
  • Derek provided a whole new perspective on the story of the sheep and the goats.  In this story, Evangelicals like to point to the words “eternal” and “punishment”, but Derek explains how those words can have an entirely different meaning, closer to the idea of a process of pruning or purging (Purgatory).
  • nonetheless, modern day Christians turn the concept of hell into a weapon, and “wield that weapon like a kid who found his dad’s gun.  And we’re just waving it all over the neighborhood, trying to get people to do what we want them to do, because it is a very, very powerful weapon.”
  • Derek questioned if they REALLY believe hell is as bad as they say. Because if they did, their preaching efforts should take on a whole new level of urgency.  In his book, he wrote: “All the violent means of conversion from the Middle Ages and the Spanish Inquisition would start to make much more sense. The foul tactics of Westboro Baptist Church would seem reasonable and appropriate.
  • this is the motive behind Derek writing this book: the Christian Church has been causing indescribable pain to people, and too many of the rest of us have too long allowed that to continue unchallenged.  As Derek said, “I’m not trying to win a debate [with theologians]; I want people to be able to live without being afraid of their God.
  • Derek now has a more redemptive view of hell: it isn’t an eternal fire of conscious torment, nor is it “a happy place where we all hold hands and sing Kumbaya,” but it is a place of purgation where impurities are burned away before enjoying an eternal life
  • Dante is most remembered for his “Inferno” picture of hell, but Derek prefers to point to Dante’s other depiction of the afterlife: Purgatory, with a beautiful story and imagery.

Luke finished by asking for an opinion on his own uncertainties about any kind of afterlife (because who can really know?), in contrast to the certainty that there is a hell/heaven to be experienced on this side of the grave. That we should be working against the many forms of “hell” that we create here and now on earth, and work towards bringing heaven down to earth (as Christ said: “thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven”).  Derek agreed with the “here and now” part of Luke’s idea, but still feels there’s also something metaphysical about it … that there is something as well “on the other side.”

As always, tell us your thoughts on this topic …

Find more information about Derek Kubilus at his own web-page, or at Eerdman’s page for his book.

If you enjoyed this episode, you may also like our previous episode about Hell (Episode #88), or our episodes on religious trauma related to the threat of hell (Episode #46 and #47), or our 7-part miniseries looking at the soul and the afterlife (Episodes #5 to #11) . Also check out Luke’s own book on the soul and the afterlife.

Episode image used by permission.

To help grow this podcast, please like, share and post a rating/review at your favorite podcast catcher.

Subscribe here to get updates each time a new episode is posted, and find us on Twitter or Facebook.

Back to Recovering Evangelicals home-page and the podcast archive

One response to “#146 – Hell? or Purgatory?”

  1. Having always believed in Hell right from the days of those horror ridden Chick pamphlets which gave a description of hell based on Jonathan Edward’s “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, I think I have reversed my position. 

    The biggest problem I have with hell is that it is predicated on the idea of free will. Most modern defences of hell say something along the lines that Hell’s doors are locked from the inside. That those inside  hell freely chose to be there either by their sinful life, rejection of God or Jesus. 

    I was always a free will absolutist as well so this description aligned with my beliefs on hell.

    However these beliefs were challenged when I had  an injury which resulted in severe ongoing chronic pain. As a result of the pain and some of the drugs I needed to control it I started having severe suicidal thoughts. Then I changed some of the drugs briefly and those thoughts disappeared instantly. It occurred to me that had I acted on my earlier thoughts some people would have believed that I would have gone to hell. It also occurred to me that my thoughts were quite easily altered by simple changes in my brain chemistry elicited by drugs. Those changes could easily result in actions which might have moral consequences. Furthermore many thoughts I had while in chronic pain might be considered sinful thoughts(thoughtsins/ thoughtcrimes even) to which God would hold me accountble. And yet how could God hold me accountable for many thoughts which were the result not of “me” but my brain chemistry.

    This led me to evaluate how much freedom of thought I really had and I started to explore the whole idea freedom of choice. I really started to consider how a just God could send people or allow people to choose to go to hell when in fact people are quite limited in their free choice. 

    Most people would say that an unrepentant murderer of all people would likely go to hell. And yet one example, among others comes to mind.

    Charles Whitman was a mass murderer who shot and killed his mother and then ascended the clock tower at Austin University on March 29, 1966 and proceeded to shoot and kill 14 others. On examine his suicide notes it was clear that he had intrusive thoughts that he couldn’t control. An autopsy further revealed a brain tumor which may have led him to have these thought and subsequently take him on a murderous rampage. 

    Is he in hell? Would a sick mind be sent to hell? In the US he might be executed or at best had life in prison had he himself not been shot and killed by police. 

    In Norway however he might have been rehabilitated since their prison system is not based on punishment as much as rehabilitation. Can Norway treat murderers better than God? 

    What about someone who is a psychopath. Reprehensible human beings? Probably incapable of remorse by virtue of their brain chemistry and genetics with maybe a poor upbringing. Do they deserve hell? Ask many Christians and they might say yes. Unrepentant people choose to go to hell. And yet do these people actually make that choice. 

    And one last example. Someone who wants to believe and earnestly seeks God. Prays and prays with no answer, And the evidence for God just fades away. Their logic overwhelms them. Then they  finally realize that they haven’t left God but God left them and He appears not to be involved in human affairs. Do they also deserve hell if at the end their logic failed them and God is there after all?

    What freedom did any of them have in terms of their beliefs?

    The whole concept of hell is based on punishment and yet somehow Christians frame hell as a form of love in that a loving God allows people to reject him as if somehow sane people would  freely reject love.  I can’t imagine anyone freely rejecting that and that given an infinite amount of time we all would accept that love. So I can’t accept Eternal Conscious Torment.

    PeGITO

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment